Case Study: How Mack & Rex Out-Cited YouTube, Amazon and Reddit Combined | WRKNG Digital
Home/ Case Studies/ Mack & Rex
WRKNG Digital · AI Commerce Case Study

How Mack & Rex earned more AI citations than YouTube, Amazon and Reddit combined.

WRKNG's AI Commerce engine took a woman-owned, kitchen-table jewelry brand from invisible in AI search to the most-cited brand in its entire category, across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and Google AI. With zero ad spend.

Mack & RexDIY Tila bead jewelry kits
Shopify · UtahWoman-owned, founded 2020
30 dayssince the system went live
0 → 724
Blog pages now cited by AI
their content was invisible before the system
+4,112%
Increase in Google impressions
blog content · 11 → 469 per day
+111%
Increase in AI Brand Mentions
225 → 475 per week
The Company

A kitchen table, a mom, and two daughters.

Mack & Rex is a small, woman-owned business based in Utah, founded in 2020 by a creative mom and her two young daughters. The name comes from the girls' nicknames, McKinlee ("Mack") and Lexi ("Rex"), who were just 8 and 11 years old when the three of them dreamed the business up.

They'd learned to make Tila bead bracelets together and found the craft genuinely addictive: the kind of creative activity anyone can pick up in an afternoon. So they set out to make it easier for everyone else to find and buy high-quality Tila bead kits and supplies.

What started at their kitchen table grew into a full-scale Shopify operation, competing for attention against global marketplaces with a fraction of their budget.

The Challenge

Invisible in the place customers had started shopping.

By 2026 the front door to a purchase had moved. Shoppers stopped typing "tila bead bracelet kit" into Google and started asking AI which one to buy, then acting on the handful of brands it named.

Mack & Rex weren't in that answer. AI recommended marketplace listings and a few other stores instead. Of every citation AI made in their category, Mack & Rex accounted for 1%. Their competitors weren't the problem. The models simply didn't know or trust them enough to name them.

And it wasn't a problem they could spend their way out of. There's no ad auction for the inside of a ChatGPT answer. They were losing customers before those customers ever saw the store, and had no way to see it happening.

The Solution

Two layers: get found, then get trusted.

Getting recommended by AI takes two things, and most brands are missing both. AI has to be able to find your products, and it has to trust your brand enough to name it. We engineered both.

Layer one: the Foundation. We rewrote every product in the catalog for the way AI actually reads a feed: titles, descriptions, structured facts, materials, use cases and the real search phrases shoppers use. Not keyword stuffing. It is the specific data a model needs to match a product to a question.

Layer two: the Content Layer. When we switched the WRKNG AEO System on it began publishing the buying guides, comparisons and answer-shaped content AI reads, trusts and cites, on their own domain, so the authority accrues to them.

Then we measured every AI answer in their category, daily, across five engines.

The Results

Where they started vs. where they are.

Same store, 30 days apart. The slate bar is the "before." The green is now.

Citation share (of everything AI cites in their category, how much is theirs)from 11%17%
Before
After
Brand coverage (how often AI mentions them by name)from 42.4%53.5%
Before
After
Domain coverage (how often AI cites their site as a source)from 44%66%
Before
After
The moment it turned on

Day one. Every channel moved at once.

Flat for six weeks of measurement. Then the WRKNG AEO System went live, and AI citations, brand mentions and Google all broke upward in the same days.

AI cites the content

Blog pages cited by AI

Cumulative AI citations · weekly
7240 system live week 1week 9
0 → 0
51 blog posts now cited. Zero for six weeks, then the system ignites.
AI recommends the brand

How often AI names "Mack & Rex"

Weekly brand mentions
4750 system live week 1week 9
+0%
225 → 475 / week, coverage 49% → 61%, already the #1 most-named brand in its category.

The icing on the cake: Google, which we weren’t aiming at

Google is not what we optimize for. The system is built to get a brand cited by AI, and search traffic is a side effect we do not aim at. It shows up anyway, so here it is.
Impressions
Clicks
00
blog impressions · matched 30-day windows
00
blog clicks · matched 30-day windows
system live · day 0 1.3K170 10 weeks beforenow
The gap

Every competitor, combined, isn't close.

Every direct competitor in the category, by how often AI cites them as a source.

Mack & Rex6,946
Koss Design580
Tai Jewelry268
Fire Mountain131
Beadsmith0
All four competitors combined: 979 citations. Mack & Rex: 6,946, seven times more than every competitor put together.
And not just competitors

6,946 > YouTube + Amazon + Reddit.

Across every AI answer in their category, this one Shopify store is referenced more often than the three biggest sources on the internet, added together.

YouTube 2,362
Amazon 2,289
Reddit 1,149
5,800the three, stacked
0
Mack & Rexone Shopify store
Extra Insights

What we learned.

It compounds, it doesn't ramp

Citations sat at zero for six straight weeks of measurement, then went vertical within days of the system going live. AI visibility isn't a slow linear climb; it's flat until you cross a threshold of citeable content, then it accelerates. Brands who quit at week four never see it.

Product pages get cited too, not just blogs

AI pulls from their collection and product pages (tila-bead-bracelet-stack, their starter kits) alongside their buying guides. That's the two-layer effect: the feed work makes products citeable, the content work makes the brand trustworthy. Neither alone gets you there.

Google was the icing, not the cake

Blog impressions went 334 → 14,069 and clicks 0 → 199 over matched 30-day windows. We never optimized for it. Whether Google rewards a piece depends on whether real search demand exists for it, which is why this lands differently for every brand, but it has never yet gone the wrong way.

You can't outspend your way in

There's no ad auction inside a ChatGPT answer. Mack & Rex beat competitors and out-cited the internet's biggest platforms on $0 of ad spend, because the position is earned through what you publish, not what you bid.

"That's our stats?! That's UNREAL. This is insane. Every business needs this. Thank you for working so hard on our business!"
Christy · Founder, Mack & Rex

Want to see where you stand in AI search?

We'll run the exact questions your buyers ask AI, show you who it recommends today, and where you rank against your competitors. Same engine that did this.

Get Your Free AI Commerce Audit

Citation, coverage and competitor data measured live across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot & Google AI (US), 2026. Google figures from Search Console, blog content only, matched 30-day windows. Prepared by WRKNG Digital · wrkngdigital.com